Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hilldale Shopping Center

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) v/r - T P 20:28, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hilldale Shopping Center

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't lay a claim or assertion of notability. It also doesn't provide reliable, secondary sources. AFAICT it's just another strip mall. I'll at least give partial credit to the creator, because it's a lot more nicely written than most of these types of articles, but it still doesn't pass WP:N. Jrcla2 (talk) 19:39, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 14:05, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:05, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as one of Madison, Wisconsin's major shopping malls with 50 years of history and enough coverage my reliable, third-party sources to cross the notability threshold. Mall is really fully-enclosed with a new mixed-use addition in front. I have expanded the previous (hidden) references and added several more from reliable sources. - Dravecky (talk) 15:45, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The citations included the New York Times and the Wisconsin Historical Society. These are third-party sources. Thank you-RFD (talk) 20:41, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Appears to have some notability. Dough 48 72 16:32, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Plenty of very solid reliable sources means it meets the general notability standards. Royal broil 03:08, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.